Every broker expansion plan starts with the same spreadsheet: which licence, at what cost, for which market access. The 2026 comparisons frame four routes: CySEC for EU access under MiFID, FCA for UK prestige at higher cost, ASIC for Asia-Pacific credibility, and offshore seats like Vanuatu, Mauritius or Seychelles for speed and leverage flexibility. Capital, leverage caps, market access and credibility trade against each other on every row. Licensing brokers can partner with SpinDepth on trust-led launches.
The four routes compared
Track360's 2026 comparison scores CySEC, FCA, ASIC and offshore on capital, leverage caps, market access and process, while Forexty's licensing guide adds cost, time, credibility and MiFID angles. FCA tops prestige and cost; CySEC balances EU access with workable capital; ASIC anchors APAC trust; offshore buys speed and high leverage at credibility discount. Most groups eventually hold several at once.
How groups sequence licences
The standard path runs offshore first for speed to revenue, CySEC or ASIC second for credibility, FCA last for prestige. Colombia-style rep offices and LATAM hubs, covered in our LATAM race, layer on top. Each licence is a marketing asset the day it grants: watch broker homepages update badges within hours. The Gulf footprint race shows permissions converting into addresses.
- CySEC for EU MiFID access
- FCA for UK prestige at top cost
- ASIC for Asia-Pacific credibility
- Offshore for speed and leverage
Key takeaways
No single licence wins every dimension. Groups sequence offshore, then CySEC or ASIC, then FCA. Each grant doubles as a marketing event worth announcing properly.
A licence is a product feature with a regulator attached. Launch it like one.
Capital requirements, in rough terms
Each licence comes with capital rules. In the EU, investment firms that deal on their own account, as most CFD brokers do, need initial capital of at least 750,000 euros under the Investment Firms Directive, and CySEC applies that framework to Cypriot firms. The FCA applies a similar regime in the UK, with permanent minimum capital of 750,000 pounds for firms dealing on their own account, plus ongoing capital and liquidity requirements. ASIC requires issuers of OTC derivatives to hold net tangible assets of at least 1 million Australian dollars or 10 percent of average revenue, whichever is greater.
Offshore regulators set much lower thresholds. That is part of why offshore licences are faster and cheaper to obtain, and part of why they carry less credibility with traders and partners.
Time to authorisation
Timelines vary. The FCA has a statutory deadline of six months to decide a complete application, and up to twelve months for an incomplete one, though preparing the application can take far longer. CySEC and ASIC applications also take months, with detailed requirements on governance, compliance staff and systems. Offshore licences can be granted in weeks to a few months. Groups that need revenue quickly often start offshore while preparing applications in stricter jurisdictions.
What each licence opens
- A CySEC licence allows a firm to serve clients across the EU through MiFID passporting, subject to EU retail rules.
- An FCA licence allows a firm to serve UK clients. Since Brexit it no longer carries EU passporting rights, so groups wanting both markets need separate EU and UK entities.
- An ASIC licence covers Australia and carries strong credibility across Asia-Pacific, though each Asian country has its own rules on serving its residents.
- Offshore licences open markets where no local licence is required, with fewer product restrictions and higher leverage.
Ongoing costs that applications do not show
The cost of a licence does not end at approval. Regulated firms pay for compliance and risk staff, independent audits, regulatory reporting such as transaction reporting under EU and UK rules, professional indemnity insurance, local office space and directors where substance rules require it, and annual fees. Rules also change: product intervention measures, marketing restrictions and capital rules have tightened over the past decade, and each change brings new costs.
Product rules that shape the business
Stricter licences come with stricter product rules. In the EU, UK and Australia, retail leverage is capped, bonuses are banned and every client must see a risk warning showing the share of accounts that lose money. Binary options are banned for retail clients in those markets. Offshore entities avoid these rules, which is why many groups keep an offshore arm alongside their tier-one entities.
What traders should take from licence strategy
For traders, a broker's licence strategy explains why the same brand offers different terms in different countries. It also explains why the entity matters more than the logo. A broker with an FCA licence may still serve you through an offshore entity if you live outside the UK. The client agreement names the entity, and the regulator's register confirms it.
A licence planning checklist for brokers
- Decide which client markets matter most and which licences can legally serve them.
- Estimate capital, staffing and ongoing compliance costs for each route.
- Plan the sequence: speed to revenue against credibility and access.
- Build compliance systems before applying, not after approval.
- Prepare for product rules that will change your marketing and margins.
Asia beyond Australia
For brokers targeting Southeast Asia, an ASIC licence brings credibility but does not by itself permit serving clients in every Asian country. Singapore requires a licence from the Monetary Authority of Singapore for leveraged foreign exchange and CFDs, Japan requires registration with its Financial Services Agency and Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines each have their own rules, some of which restrict foreign brokers from soliciting local residents. A realistic Asian strategy maps each target country's rules rather than assuming one licence covers the region.
The bottom line
The best licence depends on where the clients are, how quickly revenue is needed and how much credibility the business requires. Most serious groups end up with several, and the ones that build compliance properly from the start find each new licence easier to win.
The bigger picture
Multi-licence footprints are becoming table stakes as traders learn to check registers. The moat belongs to groups holding several credible seats while rivals rent one offshore flag.
What to watch next
Watch capital-requirement changes that reprice each route. Watch offshore tightening as credibility discounts widen. And watch badge updates on homepages, the fastest signal a licence just landed.
Which broker licence is best in 2026?
None wins outright: CySEC gives EU MiFID access, FCA gives UK prestige at higher cost, ASIC anchors Asia-Pacific trust, and offshore seats offer speed and leverage flexibility at lower credibility.
How do broker groups sequence licences?
Typically offshore first for speed to revenue, then CySEC or ASIC for credibility, then FCA for prestige, layering regional offices on top.
Why do traders care?
The licence sets leverage caps, compensation coverage and recourse, so checking the register beats reading the homepage.
Can an FCA licence be used to serve EU clients?
No. Since Brexit, UK firms no longer have EU passporting rights. Serving EU clients needs an EU-authorised entity, such as one licensed by CySEC.
How much capital does a CySEC broker need?
Investment firms dealing on their own account need initial capital of at least 750,000 euros under the EU's Investment Firms Directive, plus ongoing requirements.
Why do brokers keep offshore entities?
Offshore licences are faster and cheaper, and allow higher leverage and fewer product restrictions, so many groups use them to serve regions without local licensing.
You've finished this story
Read on, send it to someone, or ask about it.
