Skip to main content
    SpinDepth
    SpinDepth
    Juno Markets vs MH Markets: regulations and programs, compared
    Back to News

    Juno Markets vs MH Markets: regulations and programs, compared

    Juno Markets and MH Markets compete on spreads and IBs; their licences differ.

    September 16, 20262 min read

    Juno Markets and MH Markets chase the same Asia-facing trader with different ammunition: Juno pitches raw spreads from 0 pips with signals and a Port-Vila base, while MH Markets sells a global CFD catalogue with a deep IB partnership ladder. Compare their regulations and programs and the choice sharpens by trader type. The challenger check from September framed the general tier; this piece drills into the licence and program specifics. Challenger brokers can partner with SpinDepth on program and visibility campaigns.

    Regulation: two challenger paths

    Juno Markets operates from Vanuatu, an offshore seat, which is why its 0-pip raw pricing and high-leverage flexibility are possible; verify the exact entity before assuming any tier-one coverage. MH Markets positions as a global CFD house with a multi-asset reach and a partnership-first structure, but its licence map should be confirmed per client region rather than taken from marketing. Neither brand is tier-one in the FCA or ASIC sense, which is the honest starting point. The licence guide supplies the check.

    Programs: signals versus IBs

    Juno's program centres on real-time forex signals and affiliate angles, with a Myfxbook review presence where trader feedback accumulates, per the Juno Myfxbook page and Traders Union's Juno review. MH Markets leans into the introducer economy with an IB program built for networks scaling on relationships, detailed on its about page. Signals suit self-directed intraday traders; IBs suit distribution partners.

    • Juno: 0-pip raw spreads, signals, Vanuatu
    • MH Markets: global CFD, IB ladder
    • Neither holds tier-one licences
    • Choose by trader type, not logo

    Key takeaways

    Both are offshore-lean challengers competing on price and distribution. Juno suits signal-following scalpers; MH Markets suits IB-led networks. Verify entity and withdrawal rails before either.

    Challengers sell price and programs. Neither sells a tier-one licence, so check what is not on the homepage.


    The bigger picture

    Asia's challenger tier runs on price and distribution because tier-one licences are expensive and slow. The brands that pair sharp pricing with boring reliability outlast the ones that only discount.

    What to watch next

    Watch Myfxbook review trends for early warning. Watch IB commission shifts as acquisition pressure builds. And watch for tier-one licence applications, the strongest upgrade signal.

    How do Juno Markets and MH Markets differ?

    Juno pitches 0-pip raw spreads with signals from Vanuatu, while MH Markets offers a global CFD catalogue with a deeper IB partnership ladder.

    Are either tier-one regulated?

    No, both are offshore-lean challengers; verify the exact entity and regulator behind any account before funding.

    Which program should I choose?

    Signals fit self-directed intraday traders on Juno, while IB programs suit distribution partners scaling on MH Markets.

    Speak with the SpinDepth desk
    Share this story